[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329241172.4818.4.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:39:32 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, Christian Brunner <chb@....de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: fix truesize calculation when merging active
tail into lro skb
Le mardi 14 février 2012 à 09:21 -0800, Alexander Duyck a écrit :
> The code itself is correct, but the comment isn't. This code path is
> applied only to the case where we are not using pages. The default Rx
> buffer size is actually about 3K when RSC is in use, which means
> truesize is about 4.25K per buffer.
>
Hmm... any reason its not 2.25K per buffer ? (assuming MTU=1500)
Do you really need this code in ixgbe_set_rx_buffer_len() ?
/*
* Make best use of allocation by using all but 1K of a
* power of 2 allocation that will be used for skb->head.
*/
else if (max_frame <= IXGBE_RXBUFFER_3K)
rx_buf_len = IXGBE_RXBUFFER_3K;
else if (max_frame <= IXGBE_RXBUFFER_7K)
rx_buf_len = IXGBE_RXBUFFER_7K;
else if (max_frame <= IXGBE_RXBUFFER_15K)
rx_buf_len = IXGBE_RXBUFFER_15K;
else
rx_buf_len = IXGBE_MAX_RXBUFFER;
Why not using :
rx_buf_len = max_frame;
and let kmalloc() do its best ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists