[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201202152034.03000.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:34:02 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Toby Gray <toby.gray@...lvnc.com>
Cc: Toby Gray <tg@...lvnc.com>, Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.name>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
alexey.orishko@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] usb: usbnet: Add validation of dev->maxpacket to usbnet
Am Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2012, 15:47:40 schrieb Toby Gray:
> Several parts of usbnet rely on dev->maxpacket not being set to 0 to
> prevent division by zero errors.
>
> This adds validation of the dev->maxpacket value being non-zero before
> treating the device probe as successful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toby Gray <toby.gray@...lvnc.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c | 4 ++++
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
> index 4ccd316..1491c90 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/usbnet.c
> @@ -1427,6 +1427,10 @@ usbnet_probe (struct usb_interface *udev, const struct usb_device_id *prod)
> dev->rx_urb_size = dev->hard_mtu;
> if (!dev->maxpacket)
> dev->maxpacket = usb_maxpacket(dev->udev, dev->out, 1);
> + if (!dev->maxpacket) {
> + status = -ENODEV;
> + goto out3;
Hm. I am sceptical. If this happens a subdriver is buggy. We should
not hide that. I am afraid I have to reject this patch.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists