netdev - Re: bonding with 3c59x driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201202151053.14384.jdelvare@suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:53:14 +0100
From:	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To:	Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
Cc:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Steffen Klassert <klassert@...hematik.tu-chemnitz.de>,
	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bonding with 3c59x driver

On Tuesday 14 February 2012 10:06:54 pm Chris Friesen wrote:
> On 02/14/2012 01:27 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Without the patch above, doing bonding on top of 3c59x is simply
> > not possible, at least not in active-backup mode. For other modes
> > it depends if you are only interested in load balancing or also on
> > redundancy.
> 
> Could you just use arp monitoring instead of mii?

If it was just for me, I could, and probably would. But when I am trying 
to reproduce a customer bug, I have to use exactly the same options the 
customer is using.

-- 
Jean Delvare
Suse L3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html