[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <157393863283F442885425D2C454285619403DEA@nasanexd02a.na.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:09:33 +0000
From: "Huang, Xiong" <xiong@....qualcomm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Thomas Meyer <thomas@...3r.de>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jcliburn@...il.com" <jcliburn@...il.com>,
"chris.snook@...il.com" <chris.snook@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
Subject: RE: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (atl1c): transmit queue 0 timed out
Sorry, the piece of code that related to mark might be introduced by our internal test for multiple queues.
I remember mark could be changed by ip_table rule.
Thanks
Xiong
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of Eric Dumazet
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 14:18
> To: Thomas Meyer
> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; jcliburn@...il.com; chris.snook@...il.com;
> netdev; Josh Boyer
> Subject: Re: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (atl1c): transmit queue 0 timed out
>
> Le jeudi 16 février 2012 à 07:13 +0100, Thomas Meyer a écrit :
>
> > Hello Eric,
> >
> > >
> > > Thomas, have you had the chance to test this patch ?
> >
> > Yes, I'm running 3.2.6 with your patch applied for 3 days now. I didn't see
> above warning yet, but the warning was rather seldom, so I'll keep an eye on it
> in the next weeks.
> >
> > Thanks for the patch!
> >
>
> Thanks for testing !
>
> Do have any idea of what could set skb mark to 1 on some packets on your
> setup ?
>
> Some firewall rules or tc rules ?
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a
> message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists