lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120216120448.GB9504@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:04:48 +0100
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
Cc:	"'Eric Dumazet'" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	"'Nick Bowler'" <nbowler@...iptictech.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bogus frames transmitted with r8169 & fragmentation & large mtu

Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> :
[...]
> I am testing it now.

It does not fix the problem. It seems to make a difference but I still
see a few percents packet loss. The pattern has changed a bit too: there
are more bogus IP fragment offsets.

Trying with 'ping -qf -c 100 -l 2 -s 65507 10.0.7.1'

Good:

239   0.020107     10.0.7.1 -> 10.0.7.5     IP Fragmented IP protocol (proto=ICMP 0x01, off=0, ID=9f97)
240   0.020116     10.0.7.1 -> 10.0.7.5     IP Fragmented IP protocol (proto=ICMP 0x01, off=8976, ID=9f97)
241   0.020122     10.0.7.1 -> 10.0.7.5     IP Fragmented IP protocol (proto=ICMP 0x01, off=17952, ID=9f97)
242   0.020128     10.0.7.1 -> 10.0.7.5     IP Fragmented IP protocol (proto=ICMP 0x01, off=26928, ID=9f97)
243   0.020134     10.0.7.1 -> 10.0.7.5     IP Fragmented IP protocol (proto=ICMP 0x01, off=35904, ID=9f97)
244   0.020139     10.0.7.1 -> 10.0.7.5     IP Fragmented IP protocol (proto=ICMP 0x01, off=44880, ID=9f97)
245   0.020145     10.0.7.1 -> 10.0.7.5     IP Fragmented IP protocol (proto=ICMP 0x01, off=53856, ID=9f97)
246   0.020150     10.0.7.1 -> 10.0.7.5     ICMP Echo (ping) reply    (id=0x04c7, seq(be/le)=16/4096, ttl=64)

Bad:

247   0.020809     10.0.7.5 -> 10.0.7.1     IP Fragmented IP protocol (proto=ICMP 0x01, off=0, ID=dce9)
248   0.020977     10.0.7.5 -> 10.0.7.1     IP Fragmented IP protocol (proto=ICMP 0x01, off=8976, ID=dce9)
249   0.021046     10.0.7.5 -> 10.0.7.1     IP Fragmented IP protocol (proto=ICMP 0x01, off=17952, ID=dce9)
250   0.021192     10.0.7.5 -> 10.0.7.1     IP Fragmented IP protocol (proto=ICMP 0x01, off=26928, ID=dce9)
251   0.021199     10.0.7.5 -> 10.0.7.1     IP Fragmented IP protocol (proto=ICMP 0x01, off=35904, ID=dce9)
252   0.021291     10.0.7.5 -> 10.0.7.1     IP Fragmented IP protocol (proto=ICMP 0x01, off=44880, ID=dce9)
253   0.021298     10.0.7.5 -> 10.0.7.1     IP Fragmented IP protocol (proto=ICMP 0x01, off=62832, ID=dce9)

So far I have only seen it with the 2nd and last fragment.

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ