lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41230e67c273dde6b60cfc7110f496e2@visp.net.lb>
Date:	Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:14:14 +0200
From:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
To:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: sysfs warnings, reserved names

Hi

Just did a test:

ip link set dev eth1 name default

And got a lot of (expected) sysfs warnings:
[1068625.677143] sysctl table check failed: 
/net/ipv4/conf/default/promote_secondaries  Sysctl already exists
[1068625.677151] Pid: 18106, comm: ip Not tainted 3.2.4-centaur #1
and etc

Kernel 3.2.4, but i guess it doesn't matter much.
Maybe such names (as all and default) should be "reserved"?
Or it is ok like that?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ