[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41230e67c273dde6b60cfc7110f496e2@visp.net.lb>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:14:14 +0200
From: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: sysfs warnings, reserved names
Hi
Just did a test:
ip link set dev eth1 name default
And got a lot of (expected) sysfs warnings:
[1068625.677143] sysctl table check failed:
/net/ipv4/conf/default/promote_secondaries Sysctl already exists
[1068625.677151] Pid: 18106, comm: ip Not tainted 3.2.4-centaur #1
and etc
Kernel 3.2.4, but i guess it doesn't matter much.
Maybe such names (as all and default) should be "reserved"?
Or it is ok like that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists