netdev - Re: pull request: wireless 2012-02-20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120221.154053.2103818562080068513.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:40:53 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	andrei.emeltchenko.news@...il.com
Cc:	linville@...driver.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless 2012-02-20

From: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko.news@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:38:16 +0200

> Hi David,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:44 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
>> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:14:36 -0500
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:23:24PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>>>> From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
>>>> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:37:40 -0500
>>>>
>>>> > Here is another batch of fixes intended for 3.3.  Most of the fixes
>>>> > this time are for Bluetooth.
>>>>
>>>> Pulled, but please read the bluetooth changes more carefully in the
>>>> future, there were a lot of coding style errors introduced this
>>>> time around.
>>>
>>> I pinged Johan about this, and he tells me that he spoke to Marcel
>>> as well.  They were a bit unsure about the issue.  Is your concern
>>> primarily about some excessive tabbing for indentation of parameters
>>> and such?
>>
>> So you actually looked at the changes you pushed to me and you are
>> telling me you personally can't find anything that looks like garbage?
>>
>> Really?  Do I really have to point out such obvious stuff like this?
>> Are you serious?
>>
>> Look at ca0d6c7ece0e78268cd7c5c378d6b1b610625085 ("Bluetooth: Add
>> missing QUIRK_NO_RESET test to hci_dev_do_close")
>>
>> You tell me what the heck you think of this thing.
>>
>> -       if (!test_bit(HCI_RAW, &hdev->flags)) {
>> +       if (!test_bit(HCI_RAW, &hdev->flags) &&
>> +                               test_bit(HCI_QUIRK_NO_RESET, &hdev->quirks)) {
>>
>> That's disgusting, it jumps off the screen and says "Hello, I am ugly
>> as sin".  How in the world can you miss something like this?  Four
>> TABs on the second line?  Why?  I can't believe we even have to discuss
>> something like this, seriously.
> 
> Sorry did we understand wrong text of Linux coding style? Or do we need
> right interpretation of it?

I'm not engaging in this conversation any more, I don't care what CodingStyle
says, the quoted code is garbage.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html