netdev - Re: [RFC V3 PATCH] rtnetlink: Fix problem with buffer allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120221.144926.1106286806287642272.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:49:26 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	gregory.v.rose@...el.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V3 PATCH] rtnetlink: Fix problem with buffer allocation

From: "Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:46:27 +0000

> Having seen no other review comments on this RFC or the related
> iproute2 RFC I'll go ahead and work with Jeff Kirsher to get these
> patches pushed for application.

What do you mean by this?  Simply repost this patch with the fix I
asked for, and do it ASAP.

These are not Intel device driver specific changes, there is absolutely
no need to get Jeff involved at all.  It can only make things take more
time and add more red tape to the process of getting this urgent fix
propagated.

I've been extremely patient allowing you to take more than a week or
two to code up this fix for something which causes very serious
regressions for users, don't add any new things that will consume even
more time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html