netdev - Re: [PATCH V2 11/14] NET: MIPS: lantiq: convert etop driver to clkdev api

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 03:28:12 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	blogic@...nwrt.org
Cc:	ralf@...ux-mips.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 11/14] NET: MIPS: lantiq: convert etop driver to
 clkdev api

From: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:03:10 +0100

> Update from old pmu_{dis,en}able() to ckldev api.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>

Come on guys, don't do crap like this.

When you have a 14 patch series, and I only see one or two of them
I have no idea what in the world you want me to do with these patches.

Are they dependent upon the previous patches that weren't sent to me?

Are they not and I can just apply them as-is?

Could I apply them as-is, but you want them to go via the MIPS tree
for some reason and just want my ACK?

Nobody knows because you didn't bother to say one way or another
and that is extremely irritating because as a result I have to
ask you all of these stupid questions and write this rediculious
email.

I'm just ignoring every single one of these MIPS patches, sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html