netdev - [PATCH] ppp: fix 'ppp_mp_reconstruct bad seq' errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.1202241616590.5575@benxen>
Date:	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:33:56 +0000 (GMT)
From:	Ben McKeegan <ben@...servers.co.uk>
To:	davem@...emloft.net
cc:	paulus@...ba.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ppp: fix 'ppp_mp_reconstruct bad seq' errors


This patch fixes a (mostly cosmetic) bug introduced by the patch
'ppp: Use SKB queue abstraction interfaces in fragment processing'
found here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg153312.html

The above patch rewrote and moved the code responsible for cleaning
up discarded fragments but the new code does not catch every case
where this is necessary.  This results in some discarded fragments
remaining in the queue, and triggering a 'bad seq' error on the
subsequent call to ppp_mp_reconstruct.  Fragments are discarded
whenever other fragments of the same frame have been lost.
This can generate a lot of unwanted and misleading log messages.

This patch also adds additional detail to the debug logging to
make it clearer which fragments were lost and which other fragments
were discarded as a result of losses. (Run pppd with 'kdebug 1'
option to enable debug logging.)

Signed-off-by: Ben McKeegan <ben@...servers.co.uk>

diff -upr linux-3.2.7-orig/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c linux-3.2.7-fix-mp-reconstruct/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
--- linux-3.2.7-orig/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c	2012-02-21 23:27:47.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-3.2.7-fix-mp-reconstruct/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c	2012-02-23 18:05:29.000000000 +0000
@@ -2162,14 +2162,22 @@ ppp_mp_reconstruct(struct ppp *ppp)
 			continue;
 		}
 		if (PPP_MP_CB(p)->sequence != seq) {
+			u32 oldseq;
 			/* Fragment `seq' is missing.  If it is after
 			   minseq, it might arrive later, so stop here. */
 			if (seq_after(seq, minseq))
 				break;
 			/* Fragment `seq' is lost, keep going. */
 			lost = 1;
+			oldseq = seq;
 			seq = seq_before(minseq, PPP_MP_CB(p)->sequence)?
 				minseq + 1: PPP_MP_CB(p)->sequence;
+
+			if (ppp->debug & 1)
+				netdev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, ppp->dev,
+					      "lost frag %u..%u\n",
+					      oldseq, seq-1);
+
 			goto again;
 		}

@@ -2214,6 +2222,10 @@ ppp_mp_reconstruct(struct ppp *ppp)
 			struct sk_buff *tmp2;

 			skb_queue_reverse_walk_from_safe(list, p, tmp2) {
+				if (ppp->debug & 1)
+					netdev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, ppp->dev,
+						      "discarding frag %u\n",
+						      PPP_MP_CB(p)->sequence);
 				__skb_unlink(p, list);
 				kfree_skb(p);
 			}
@@ -2229,6 +2241,17 @@ ppp_mp_reconstruct(struct ppp *ppp)
 		/* If we have discarded any fragments,
 		   signal a receive error. */
 		if (PPP_MP_CB(head)->sequence != ppp->nextseq) {
+			skb_queue_walk_safe(list, p, tmp) {
+				if (p == head)
+					break;
+				if (ppp->debug & 1)
+					netdev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, ppp->dev,
+						      "discarding frag %u\n",
+						      PPP_MP_CB(p)->sequence);
+				__skb_unlink(p, list);
+				kfree_skb(p);
+			}
+
 			if (ppp->debug & 1)
 				netdev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, ppp->dev,
 					      "  missed pkts %u..%u\n",
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html