[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120228.160657.419169586061006044.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:06:57 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ncardwell@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi,
nanditad@...gle.com, ycheng@...gle.com, therbert@...gle.com,
subramanian.vijay@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: fix false reordering signal in tcp_shifted_skb
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:06:19 -0500
> When tcp_shifted_skb() shifts bytes from the skb that is currently
> pointed to by 'highest_sack' then the increment of
> TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq implicitly advances tcp_highest_sack_seq(). This
> implicit advancement, combined with the recent fix to pass the correct
> SACKed range into tcp_sacktag_one(), caused tcp_sacktag_one() to think
> that the newly SACKed range was before the tcp_highest_sack_seq(),
> leading to a call to tcp_update_reordering() with a degree of
> reordering matching the size of the newly SACKed range (typically just
> 1 packet, which is a NOP, but potentially larger).
>
> This commit fixes this by simply calling tcp_sacktag_one() before the
> TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq advancement that can advance our notion of the
> highest SACKed sequence.
>
> Correspondingly, we can simplify the code a little now that
> tcp_shifted_skb() should update the lost_cnt_hint in all cases where
> skb == tp->lost_skb_hint.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks Neal.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists