[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201202291724.06641.danny.kukawka@bisect.de>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:24:05 +0100
From: Danny Kukawka <danny.kukawka@...ect.de>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] validate MAC address before call .ndo_set_mac_address
On Mittwoch, 29. Februar 2012, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 29. Februar 2012, you wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 16:42 +0100, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> > > Validate the given MAC address directly in dev_set_mac_address()
> > > if a .ndo_validate_addr function is available before calling
> > > the .ndo_set_mac_address function.
> > >
> > > Changed .ndo_validate_addr to take a second parameter containing
> > > a sockaddr struct to be checked instead of the net_device dev_addr.
> > > The behaviour of .ndo_validate_addr is now: if the second parameter
> > > is NULL the net_device->dev_addr gets validate, if != NULL
> > > the given parameter/sockaddr gets validated instead.
> > >
> > > This patch series include adaptations for some drivers which
> > > use .ndo_set_mac_address functions directly - to prevent double
> > > checks and to enable validations via .ndo_validate_addr.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > You have to do this as a single patch. The kernel and drivers should
> > still build at each stage.
>
> Okay. In this case only patch 1 and 2 needs to be merged into one
> commit/patch since the other will even work with out patch one or two. I
> will send a new version of the series as soon as I get more comments on the
> content.
I have to send a new version anyway since I've accidently forgot to run
checkpatch.pl. Sorry.
Danny
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists