netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] net: validate MAC address directly in dev_set_mac

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120301.162130.2267876784560089802.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:21:30 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc:	danny.kukawka@...ect.de, eilong@...adcom.com, dkukawka@...e.de,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com, mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl, jpirko@...hat.com,
	nhorman@...driver.com, rdunlap@...otime.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] net: validate MAC address directly in
 dev_set_mac_address()

From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 17:51:29 +0000

> On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 17:52 +0100, Danny Kukawka wrote:
>> Validate the given MAC address directly in dev_set_mac_address()
>> if a .ndo_validate_addr function is available before calling
>> the .ndo_set_mac_address function.
>> 
>> Changed .ndo_validate_addr to take a second parameter containing
>> a sockaddr struct to be checked instead of the net_device dev_addr.
>> The behaviour of .ndo_validate_addr is now: if the second parameter
>> is NULL the net_device->dev_addr gets validate, if != NULL
>> the given parameter/sockaddr gets validated instead.
> [...]
> 
> The caller is assumed to have validated the address family, so why not
> just pass a pointer to the hardware address (u8 *), and get rid of the
> special case for NULL?
> 
> That is, dev_set_mac_address would call:
> 	ops->ndo_validate_addr(dev, sa->sa_data);
> and dev_open would call:
> 	ops->ndo_validate_addr(dev, dev->dev_addr);

Yes, this looks a lot better.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html