[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOD=uF5Ux0w=EPbX0V3qOy1VnZQr6Q35uUxrF9Qv1hZ4MjYJOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:07:14 +0530
From: santosh prasad nayak <santoshprasadnayak@...il.com>
To: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko.news@...il.com>
Cc: marcel@...tmann.org, padovan@...fusion.mobi, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Silence static checker warning.
@Dan,
In future patches I will take care of it. Is it ok ? If
required I can resend the patch with required changes on subject line.
@Andrei
In my local clone your changes are not visible.
What is the schedule of linux-next ?
Is it updated every week or bi-weekly or monthly ?
Regards
Santosh
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Andrei Emeltchenko
<andrei.emeltchenko.news@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Santosh,
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:06 PM, santosh nayak
> <santoshprasadnayak@...il.com> wrote:
>> From: Santosh Nayak <santoshprasadnayak@...il.com>
>>
>> Silencing Static checker warning.
>> 1. Endian warning
>> 2. variable dereferenced before check 'sk' .
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Nayak <santoshprasadnayak@...il.com>
>> ---
>> net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 9 ++++++---
>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
>> index 401d942..d206321 100644
>> --- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c
>> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static int l2cap_sock_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int alen)
>> }
>>
>> if (la.l2_cid)
>> - err = l2cap_add_scid(chan, la.l2_cid);
>> + err = l2cap_add_scid(chan, __le16_to_cpu(la.l2_cid));
>> else
>> err = l2cap_add_psm(chan, &la.l2_bdaddr, la.l2_psm);
>>
>> @@ -123,7 +123,8 @@ static int l2cap_sock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int al
>> if (la.l2_cid && la.l2_psm)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - err = l2cap_chan_connect(chan, la.l2_psm, la.l2_cid, &la.l2_bdaddr);
>> + err = l2cap_chan_connect(chan, la.l2_psm, __le16_to_cpu(la.l2_cid),
>> + &la.l2_bdaddr);
>> if (err)
>> goto done;
>>
>> @@ -795,7 +796,7 @@ static void l2cap_sock_kill(struct sock *sk)
>> static int l2cap_sock_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int how)
>> {
>> struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
>> - struct l2cap_chan *chan = l2cap_pi(sk)->chan;
>> + struct l2cap_chan *chan;
>> int err = 0;
>>
>> BT_DBG("sock %p, sk %p", sock, sk);
>> @@ -803,6 +804,8 @@ static int l2cap_sock_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int how)
>> if (!sk)
>> return 0;
>>
>> + chan = l2cap_pi(sk)->chan;
>> +
>
> Didn't I fix this bug already?
>
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/21537
>
> Regards,
> Andrei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists