[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120301.170848.432407217191581288.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:08:48 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: luiz.dentz@...il.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk,
rodrigo.moya@...labora.co.uk, javier@...labora.co.uk,
lennart@...ttering.net, kay.sievers@...y.org,
alban.crequy@...labora.co.uk, bart.cerneels@...labora.co.uk,
sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] af_unix: add multicast and filtering features to
AF_UNIX
From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 00:01:40 +0200
> I don't think you understood the problem, we want something that scale
> for less powerful devices, why do you think Android have all the
> trouble to create binder?
So our protocol stack is so cpu hungry compared to AF_UNIX that it's
unusable on low power devices?
I can't take you seriously if you say this after showing us the
thousands of lines of code you guys think we should add to the AF_UNIX
socket layer.
> Besides what is really the point in having AF_UNIX if you can't use
> for what it is for?
Because it doesn't have the handful of extra features you absolutely
require of it.
AF_UNIX is a complicated socket layer which is already extremely hard
to maintain. We're still finding bugs in it even after all these
years, and that's without adding major new functionality.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists