netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3] netfilter: Fix copy_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120301101809.GA6488@1984>
Date:	Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:18:09 +0100
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	santosh nayak <santoshprasadnayak@...il.com>
Cc:	bart.de.schuymer@...dora.be, kaber@...sh.net,
	shemminger@...tta.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org,
	coreteam@...filter.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] netfilter: Fix copy_to_user too small size
 parametre.

On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:46:30PM +0530, santosh nayak wrote:
> From: Santosh Nayak <santoshprasadnayak@...il.com>
> 
> While copying to userspace, the size of source is 29byte where as
> size parametre is 32 byte.  Its leaking extra-information from
> kernel space to user space.
> Replace EBT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN by XT_EXTENSION_MAXNAMELEN.

There's no information leak.

Let me clarify this. Have a look at /linux/netfilter/x_tables.h, then
you find:

#define XT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN 30
#define XT_EXTENSION_MAXNAMELEN 29
#define XT_TABLE_MAXNAMELEN 32

For iptables, everything has been 30 bytes, but we stole one
byte to store the revision field for matches/targets.

For ebtables, there's no revision field and the length of the
table name is different.

But linux/netfilter/in ebtables.h, you'll find:

#define EBT_TABLE_MAXNAMELEN 32
#define EBT_CHAIN_MAXNAMELEN EBT_TABLE_MAXNAMELEN
#define EBT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN EBT_TABLE_MAXNAMELEN

Note that someone decided to use 32 bytes for the ebtables
tables/match/target name instead of 30 bytes in iptables.

Yes, it sucks a bit we have to live with these interfaces until
we have some netlink interface for all these things.

> Signed-off-by: Santosh Nayak <santoshprasadnayak@...il.com>
> ---
>  net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
> index 5864cc4..f3fcbd9 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
> @@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ static inline int ebt_make_matchname(const struct ebt_entry_match *m,
>      const char *base, char __user *ubase)
>  {
>  	char __user *hlp = ubase + ((char *)m - base);
> -	if (copy_to_user(hlp, m->u.match->name, EBT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN))
> +	if (copy_to_user(hlp, m->u.match->name, XT_EXTENSION_MAXNAMELEN))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ static inline int ebt_make_watchername(const struct ebt_entry_watcher *w,
>      const char *base, char __user *ubase)
>  {
>  	char __user *hlp = ubase + ((char *)w - base);
> -	if (copy_to_user(hlp , w->u.watcher->name, EBT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN))
> +	if (copy_to_user(hlp , w->u.watcher->name, XT_EXTENSION_MAXNAMELEN))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1368,7 +1368,7 @@ ebt_make_names(struct ebt_entry *e, const char *base, char __user *ubase)
>  	ret = EBT_WATCHER_ITERATE(e, ebt_make_watchername, base, ubase);
>  	if (ret != 0)
>  		return ret;
> -	if (copy_to_user(hlp, t->u.target->name, EBT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN))
> +	if (copy_to_user(hlp, t->u.target->name, XT_EXTENSION_MAXNAMELEN))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.7.4.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html