[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120302193416.GA22055@burratino>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:34:16 -0600
From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: acme@...hat.com, roel.kluin@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Mason Loring Bliss <mason@...sses.org>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [NET]: da.s_net not copied but assigned to itself in
aarp_rcv()
Hi Dave,
David Miller wrote:
>> Em Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:32:11PM +0100, Roel Kluin escreveu:
>>> da.s_net was not copied but assigned to itself.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
[...]
> Applied, please always CC: on networking patches.
Thanks.
Without this patch (commit 2a04cd4c7 aka v2.6.33-rc6~29^2~33), Mason
(cc-ed) is not able to use appletalk[1]:
| With Linux 2.6.32 as supplied with Debian Squeeze, Netatalk is unable
| to thrive. Connections made to afpd will open, but attempting to transfer
| files will take a very long time and/or eventually time out.
|
| I've noted this with both Netatalk as supplied with Squeeze and with
| Netatalk 2.2.1 built from the Wheezy source package, which I evidently
| need for AFP 3 support.
|
| Installing Linux 3.2 from backports, with no other changes to the system,
| allows afpd to work correctly.
Ben sent a copy of this patch to try against 2.6.32.y and it worked.
Would it be possible to include this in the 2.6.32.y-longterm tree?
Sincerely,
Jonathan
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/660902
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists