[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1330661602.1939.13.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 20:13:22 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: gustavo@...ovan.org, johan.hedberg@...il.com,
linville@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: bluetooth-next 2012-03-01
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 22:26 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> You know what really pisses me off? This is the one issue I made a huge
> stink about last week, arguments to function calls and prototypes lining
> up properl. And it's in ever 2nd or 3rd commit in this pull request.
[]
> Come back when you've audited this whole thing properly and honestly.
I submitted a patch to checkpatch for a --strict rule for
this argument alignment. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/29/644
Are there any other tests you think should be added with
--strict?
Some I think possible are:
o no space after cast
struct foo *bar = (struct foo *) baz;
sb:
struct foo *bar = (struct foo *)baz;
o don't start comments with /*$
(perhaps only if a blank line proceeds the comment)
/*
* multiline comment
* ...
*/
sb:
/* multiline comment
* ...
*/
o coalesce formats
pr_<level>("format part 1 "
"format part 2\n", ...)
sb:
pr_<level>("format part 1 format part 2\n",
...);
o symmetric brace standardization
if (foo) {
bar;
baz;
} else
bar;
sb:
if (foo) {
bar;
baz;
} else {
bar;
}
Any others?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists