netdev - Re: [PATCH v12 01/13] sk_run_filter: add support for custom load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120302114705.0a9542e138927897f16282ca@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:47:05 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
	davem@...emloft.net, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, rdunlap@...otime.net,
	mcgrathr@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de, luto@....edu,
	eparis@...hat.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com, djm@...drot.org,
	scarybeasts@...il.com, indan@....nu, pmoore@...hat.com,
	corbet@....net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, markus@...omium.org,
	coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/13] sk_run_filter: add support for custom
 load_pointer

Hi Kees,

On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:37:12 -0800 Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Is it time to pull this into -next so more people can feel it? I brought
> Andy Lutomirski's patches forward (needed to bump the prctl values), and
> updated my git tree. If we're ready, here it is in all its request-pull
> format glory:
> 
> The following changes since commit 2422c8368337196594265d52cad7316c9404bfcf:
>   Stephen Rothwell (1):
>         Add linux-next specific files for 20120301

OK, not commenting on anything else, but I cannot merge that into
linux-next because it is based on yesterday's linux-next release and
linux-next (effectively) rebases every day ...

Does this work depend on anything in linux-next?  Or could it be just
based off Linus' tree.  If it depends on other tree(s) merged into
linux-next, then you should base your tree on those tree(s) as long as
they never get rebased ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped