netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/4] Netfilter: Merge ipt_LOG and ip6_LOG into xt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:52:50 +0100
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
CC:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	jengelh@...ozas.de, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Netfilter: Merge ipt_LOG and ip6_LOG into xt_LOG

Am 02.03.2012 17:49, schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:39:15PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 01.03.2012 12:27, schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso:
>>> While merging ipt_LOG and ip6t_LOG, you introduced some bug that
>>> corrupts the log line. Note the extra PROTO=, I don't have any UDPLITE
>>> traffic here.
>>>
>>> Looks like a missing break in one switch.
>>
>> I got confused by my own logic. :-\
>> Does the attached patch fix the issue?
>> It's based on "Netfilter: xt_LOG: Add timestamp support"
> 
> This patch lacks of description. If you don't make it myself, I have
> to do it for you :-(
> 
> Please, send me patches following the standard format next time.

It was a "does this patch solve the problem"-Patch.
Does it fix the problem?

If so, I'll send an official one...

Thanks,
//richard


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)