[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F5651E5.1020005@opengridcomputing.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:05:25 -0600
From: Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
To: Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com>
CC: linux-rdma <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Vipul Pandya <vipul@...lsio.com>
Subject: rds cq event handler issue
Hey Venkat,
I think I see a bug in the RDS RDMA module where RDS is not adhering to the RDMA locking context. From the kernel tree
Documentation/infiniband/core_locking.txt:
---
The context in which completion event and asynchronous event
callbacks run is not defined. Depending on the low-level driver, it
may be process context, softirq context, or interrupt context.
Upper level protocol consumers may not sleep in a callback.
---
So RDMA ULPs cannot assume any certain context for their callback functions. Yet I get a BUG_ON() when running RDS with
iw_cxgb3 where RDS is bugging in rds_rdma_free_op():
---
/* Mark page dirty if it was possibly modified, which
* is the case for a RDMA_READ which copies from remote
* to local memory */
if (!ro->op_write) {
BUG_ON(irqs_disabled());
set_page_dirty(page);
}
---
And rds_rdma_free_op() can be called in the cq callback path. Here's a stack trace when it bugged:
---
Call Trace:
<IRQ> [<ffffffff886ca0fc>] :rds:rds_message_purge+0x54/0x79
[<ffffffff886ca162>] :rds:rds_message_put+0x41/0x4c
[<ffffffff886f616b>] :rds_rdma:rds_iw_send_unmap_rm+0xe2/0xf2
[<ffffffff886f63c4>] :rds_rdma:rds_iw_send_cq_comp_handler+0x193/0x2e5
[<ffffffff88698a56>] :iw_cxgb3:iwch_ev_dispatch+0x1df/0x2b1
[<ffffffff8869f0b2>] :iw_cxgb3:cxio_hal_ev_handler+0x6b/0xb4
[<ffffffff882746cd>] :cxgb3:process_rx+0x3d/0xa0
[<ffffffff8827b28c>] :cxgb3:process_responses+0x120c/0x1350
---
iwch_ev_dispatch() explicitly disables irqs to ensure proper serialization:
---
spin_lock_irqsave(&chp->comp_handler_lock, flag);
(*chp->ibcq.comp_handler)(&chp->ibcq, chp->ibcq.cq_context);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chp->comp_handler_lock, flag);
---
I'm not sure if that BUG_ON() in rds_rdma_free_op() is valid or not. If it is valid, then RDS needs to run this logic
in a safe context, not in the context of the CQ callback. It BUG_ON() is not valid, we can remove it :).
Can you comment?
Thanks,
Steve.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists