[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120309.130006.1423350346805366510.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:00:06 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: richardcochran@...il.com
Cc: tshimizu818@...il.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi, mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, jdmason@...zu.us,
john.stultz@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, khc@...waw.pl,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
qi.wang@...el.com, yong.y.wang@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com,
kok.howg.ewe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RE-SUBMIT] net/pch_gbe: supports eg20t ptp clock
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 18:30:32 +0100
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 09:34:53PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> You still haven't submitted this properly.
>>
>> First, you submitted the PCH_GBE driver changes before the EG20T
>> PTP clock driver which it depends upon.
>
> David, both this pair of patches and the second pair apply cleanly to
> both Torvalds mainline and to net-next. So, what are you complaining
> about here? I am still confused.
I'm complaining submitting changes properly, and that has nothing
to do with where or how cleanly the patches apply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists