lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:00:06 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	richardcochran@...il.com
Cc:	tshimizu818@...il.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
	lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi, mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl,
	paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, jdmason@...zu.us,
	john.stultz@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, khc@...waw.pl,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	qi.wang@...el.com, yong.y.wang@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com,
	kok.howg.ewe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RE-SUBMIT] net/pch_gbe: supports eg20t ptp clock

From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 18:30:32 +0100

> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 09:34:53PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> 
>> You still haven't submitted this properly.
>> 
>> First, you submitted the PCH_GBE driver changes before the EG20T
>> PTP clock driver which it depends upon.
> 
> David, both this pair of patches and the second pair apply cleanly to
> both Torvalds mainline and to net-next. So, what are you complaining
> about here? I am still confused.

I'm complaining submitting changes properly, and that has nothing
to do with where or how cleanly the patches apply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists