netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] net/hyperv: Fix data corruption in rndis_filter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120311.155111.1595145426893784653.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	haiyangz@...rosoft.com
Cc:	kys@...rosoft.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net/hyperv: Fix data corruption in
 rndis_filter_receive()

It is very tiring explaining how to submit patches properly, and
here you've made a poor submission once again.

You haven't indicated what tree you want these changes applied to.

You also mixed bug fixes and feature patches into the same patch set.

So the patch set isn't appropriate for the 'net' tree, because only
the most critical bug fixes can go there now.

And this patch set is also not appropriate for the 'net-next' tree
because I can only presume you want the important bug fix propagated
upstream as fast as possible but it cannot go in with the feature
patch since the feature patch is absolutely not appropriate for the
'net' tree right now.

I really don't see why it's such a hard thing to simply say where you
want patches applied when you submit them.  Do you want me to simply
guess?  How else am I supposed to figure out what you want?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html