[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120311.211424.996831768685832926.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: therbert@...gle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Provide SYN packet for passive connections
From: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:08:38 -0700
> For inet_connection_sock I believe there are fields that would only be
> used for a listeners(e.g. icsk_accept_queue), and fields that would
> only be used for a real connection (e.g. icsk_retransmits). Would it
> be worth it to split these into a union?
Indeed, it might.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists