[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120312061702.GA1911@netboy.at.omicron.at>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:17:02 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Takahiro Shimizu <tshimizu818@...il.com>
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net,
lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi, mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, jdmason@...zu.us,
john.stultz@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, khc@...waw.pl,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
qi.wang@...el.com, yong.y.wang@...el.com, joel.clark@...el.com,
kok.howg.ewe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RE-SUBMIT 2/2] net/pch_gbe: supports eg20t ptp clock
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:35:44AM +0900, Takahiro Shimizu wrote:
> Hello Richard,
>
> Thank you for the comment.
>
> > + if ((sk_run_filter(skb, ptp_filter) != PTP_CLASS_V2_IPV4) &&
> > > + (sk_run_filter(skb, ptp_filter) != PTP_CLASS_V1_IPV4)) {
> >
> > No, just run the filter once and test the result twice.
> >
> > Also, doesn't the timestamping unit work with IPv6 and L2? If so,
> > don't restrict the driver to IPv4.
> >
> >
> According to the EG20T spec, it support IPv6 too. But I did not any test
> about IPv6 now.
> Do you mean I don't restrict anything here?
No, what I mean is that you only accept PTP_CLASS_V1_IPV4 or
PTP_CLASS_V2_IPV4. You should accept any packet type supported by the
hardware.
If someone tries to use your driver with PTPv2 over UDPv6, for
example, then the filter will return PTP_CLASS_V2_IPV6, and the match
will fail. It will also fail for PTPv2 L2 and PTPv2 L2/VLAN.
It does not make sense to me to limit the driver in this way.
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists