netdev - Re: Namespaces and inetpeer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120312085756.GL15404@secunet.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:57:56 +0100
From:	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Namespaces and inetpeer

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:25:29AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Hi:
> 
> While looking through the inetpeer code I noticed that there is
> no namespace support at all.  This means that metric and other
> information will be leaking across namespaces.  As IP addresses
> are meant to be independent between them, this is not a good thing.
> 

Actually, it would be nice if we could have an inetpeer base per
fib table. This would imply namespace awareness and it would
handle the problem when we have mulitiple routes (with different
metrics etc.) to the same ip address on policy routing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html