netdev - RE: [PATCH 3/4] batman-adv: Use {} braces consistent on the arms of a statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B6E9D@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:16:43 -0000
From:	"David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	"Marek Lindner" <lindner_marek@...oo.de>, <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.org>,
	"Sven Eckelmann" <sven@...fation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] batman-adv: Use {} braces consistent on the arms of a statement

 
> diff --git a/net/batman-adv/routing.c b/net/batman-adv/routing.c
> index 01b66d4..7f8e158 100644
> --- a/net/batman-adv/routing.c
> +++ b/net/batman-adv/routing.c
> @@ -237,8 +237,9 @@ int window_protected(struct bat_priv 
> *bat_priv, int32_t seq_num_diff,
>  				"old packet received, start
protection\n");
>  
>  			return 0;
> -		} else
> +		} else {
>  			return 1;
> +		}
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }

Doesn't this one fail on the "don't use 'else' after return/break" ?
Also look like it would read better if the condition (not quoted)
were inverted and the 'return 1' put first.

	David


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html