[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGm1_kuHYCRuoUEfBeV6GbjypUJgr1_058f-e4AhojHP1fTJWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:53:51 +0100
From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>
To: shemminger@...tta.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: iproute2: iplink_ stuff cleanup
Hello Stephen,
I'm still struggling to get ip/iplink_* routines to show up in
Android's ip binary
(https://groups.google.com/d/topic/android-building/yjV4iYnT1Zc/discussion).
I've looked at the algorithm that is used to access those functions
(like can_parse_opt, vlan_parse_opt etc.)
snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), LIBDIR "/ip/link_%s.so", id);
dlh = dlopen(buf, RTLD_LAZY);
if (dlh == NULL) {
/* look in current binary, only open once */
dlh = BODY;
if (dlh == NULL) {
dlh = BODY = dlopen(NULL, RTLD_LAZY);
if (dlh == NULL)
return NULL;
}
}
snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s_link_util", id);
l = dlsym(dlh, buf);
if (l == NULL)
return NULL;
as far as I can see from the ip/Makefile there are no dynamic libs
like /ip/link_%s.so. Wouldn't it be simpler to let all iplink_*
objects to export their interfaces via header files and just make a
table in ip/iplink.c to hold protocol ID and pointer at link_utils
struct.
struct link_util can_link_util = {
.id = "can",
.maxattr = IFLA_CAN_MAX,
.parse_opt = can_parse_opt,
.print_opt = can_print_opt,
.print_xstats = can_print_xstats,
};
Am I missing something?
Regards,
Yegor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists