[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877gyhxrlu.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:46:29 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V4 PATCH] virtio-net: send gratuitous packet when needed
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:33:31 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_net.h b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > index 970d5a2..44a38d6 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_net.h
> > @@ -49,8 +49,10 @@
> > #define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX 18 /* Control channel RX mode support */
> > #define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN 19 /* Control channel VLAN filtering */
> > #define VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX_EXTRA 20 /* Extra RX mode control support */
> > +#define VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ANNOUNCE 21 /* Guest can send gratituous packet */
> >
> > #define VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP 1 /* Link is up */
> > +#define VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE 2 /* Announcement is needed */
>
> I would put this in bit 8 (0x100), this way low status byte
> is RO, high byte is RW.
The whole idea of acking by clearing the bit is unreliable, moving to a
separate byte just controls the damage.
How about you use bits 8-15 as a counter? It's still theoretically
unreliable if 256 notifications pass before the guest notices, but it's
probably better and clearer than this.
I leave the final call to MST though.
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
How could I marry someone with more hair than me? http://baldalex.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists