lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:46:58 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <>
To:	Haiyang Zhang <>
Cc:	Stephen Hemminger <>,
	KY Srinivasan <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] net/hyperv: Fix the code handling tx busy

On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 19:17 +0000, Haiyang Zhang wrote:

> Yes, we called the stop_queue before returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY.
> The stop_queue was called in the function netvsc_send() in file
> netvsc.c, then it returns to rndis_filter_send(), which returns to
> netvsc_start_xmit() in file netvsc_drv.c. So the NETDEV_TX_BUSY is
> indeed returned AFTER queue is stopped.

Thats should be in your changelog, so that next time, reviewers dont
have to spend their time to check you did it right, especially when
start_xmit() code is not self contained or at least in a single file.

Each time we see a NETDEV_TX_BUSY in a patch, this is a sign of a
possible problem.

Your initial changelog was :

Instead of dropping the packet, we keep the skb buffer, and return
NETDEV_TX_BUSY to let upper layer retry send. This will not cause
endless loop, because the host is taking data away from ring buffer.

And this is the typical message that doesnt explain why its safe.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists