netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/8] net/mlx4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F686A07.4070401@mellanox.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:29:11 +0200
From:	Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
To:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
	Oren Duer <oren@...lanox.com>,
	Yevgeny Petrilin <yevgenyp@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] net/mlx4_en: DCB QoS support

On 03/13/2012 07:21 PM, Amir Vadai wrote:
> DCBX version 802.1qaz is supported.
> User Priority (UP) is set in QP context instead of in WQE (QP Work Queue
> Element), which means that all traffic from a queue will have the same UP.
> UP is also set for untagged traffic to be able to classify such traffic too.
>
> Mapping from sk_prio to User Priority is done by sch_mqprio mapping. Although
> confusingly sch_mqprio maps sk_prio to something called TC, it is not related
> to DCBX's TC, and is interpreted by mlx4_en driver as UP.
>
> The Current HW based QoS mechanism which was introduced in commit 4f57c087de9
> "net: implement mechanism for HW based QOS" is in orientation to ETS traffic
> class. Patch 7/8 introduces an approach which allow to use this mechanism also
> with hardware who has queues per user priority (UP). After the change,
> __skb_tx_hash() will direct a flow to a tx ring from a range of tx rings. This
> range is defined by the caller function by the specific HW. If TC based queues,
> the range is by TC number and for UP based queues, the range is by UP.
>
> Amir Vadai (8):
>    net/mlx4_en: Force user priority by QP attribute
>    net/mlx4_core: set port QoS attributes
>    net/mlx4_en: DCB QoS support
>    net/mlx4_en: Set max rate-limit for a TC
>    net/mlx4_en: sk_prio<=>  UP for untagged traffic
>    IB/rdma_cm: TOS<=>  UP mapping for IBoE
>    net: support tx_ring per UP in HW based QoS mechanism
>    net/mlx4_en: num cores tx rings for every UP
>
>   drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c                     |   35 ++++-
>   drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c   |   11 +-
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/Kconfig        |   12 ++
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/Makefile       |    1 +
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_dcb_nl.c    |  215 +++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_main.c      |    6 +-
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_netdev.c    |   64 ++++++-
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_port.h      |    2 +
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_resources.c |    6 +-
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c        |    4 +-
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_sysfs.c     |  120 ++++++++++++
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_tx.c        |   20 +-
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4.h         |   20 ++
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/mlx4_en.h      |   38 +++-
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/port.c         |   62 ++++++
>   include/linux/mlx4/cmd.h                          |    4 +
>   include/linux/mlx4/device.h                       |    3 +
>   include/linux/mlx4/qp.h                           |    3 +-
>   include/linux/netdevice.h                         |   12 +-
>   include/linux/skbuff.h                            |    3 +-
>   net/core/dev.c                                    |   10 +-
>   21 files changed, 615 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_dcb_nl.c
>   create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_sysfs.c
>


Hi Dave,

Patches 7-8 who deal with the interaction between the kernel HW QoS 
constructs to the queue selection logic are still under discussion with 
John and some changes might be needed there.
At this point, we ask for patches 1-6 to be pulled in, and continue the 
discussion from there.

Thanks,
Amir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html