[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1332324196.25742.8.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 03:03:16 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
Oren Duer <oren@...lanox.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.co.il>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 6/6] IB/rdma_cm: TOS <=> UP mapping for IBoE
Le mercredi 21 mars 2012 à 11:25 +0200, Amir Vadai a écrit :
> From: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.co.il>
>
> Both tagged traffic and untagged traffic use tc tool mapping.
> Treat RDMA TOS same as IP TOS when mapping to SL
>
> Since IP TOS to priority mapping is not exported, had to borrow the code from
> net/ipv4/route.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.co.il>
> CC: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>
>
> ---
>
> We can export IP TOS to priority mapping if the networking maintainers will say
> where they want it.
Yes please do so. This makes no sense to duplicate ip_tos2prio[]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists