lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:28:42 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	"Prashant Batra (prbatra)" <prbatra@...co.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Query regarding pf_packet sockets

On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 08:52 +0530, Prashant Batra (prbatra) wrote:
> Hi ,
> 
> I am trying to use PF_PACKET socket along with filters applied on the socket through setsockopt, SO_ATTACH_FILTER.
> Now as I create this socket, any packet coming to the kernel would be copied into the socket buffer for this socket.
> 
> So, even if I apply the filter, first few packets would always be those which do not match the filter. 
> 
> Is there a way (some socket option),  to make socket passive and active, so that I will set the socket in passive mode after creation, 
> and then set it as active, after I apply the filter, so that I only receive the filtered packet in user space.
> 
> Thanks,
> Prashant
> 
1) open PF_PACKET
2)  Install a "deny all packets" filter
3) read all packets that might have been captured right before 2)
4) Install your filter

This is what is done by libpcap




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists