| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2657507.ZkkGW14H3c@tomlt1.ibmoffice.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:10:52 -0500
From: Thomas Lendacky <tahm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Cc: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] NUMA aware scheduling per cpu vhost thread
On Friday, March 23, 2012 12:00:54 PM Rick Jones wrote:
> On 03/23/2012 11:32 AM, Thomas Lendacky wrote:
> > I ran a series of TCP_RR, UDP_RR, TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS tests
> > against the recent vhost patches. For simplicity, the patches
> > submitted by Anthony that increase the number of threads per vhost
> > instance I will call multi-worker and the patches submitted by Shirley
> > that provide a vhost thread per cpu I will call per-cpu.
>
> Lots of nice data there - kudos.
>
> > Quick description of the tests:
> > TCP_RR and UDP_RR using 256 byte request/response size in 1, 10, 30
> > and 60 instances
>
> There is a point, not quite sure where, when aggregate, synchronous
> single-transaction netperf tests become as much a context switching test
> as a networking test. That is why netperf RR has support for the "burst
> mode" to have more than one transaction in flight at one time:
>
> http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk/doc/netperf.html#Using-_002d_002de
> nable_002dburst
>
> When looking to measure packet/transaction per second scaling I've taken
> to finding the peak for a single stream by running up the burst size,
> (TCP_NODELAY set) and then running 1, 2, 4 etc of those streams. With
> the occasional ethtool -S audit to make sure that each TCP_RR
> transaction is indeed a discrete pair of TCP segments...
>
> In addition to avoiding concerns about becoming a context switching
> exercise, the reduction in netperf instances means less chance for skew
> error on startup and shutdown. To address that I've somewhat recently
> taken to using demo mode in netperf and then post-processing the results
> through rrdtool:
>
> http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk/doc/netperf.html#Using-_002d_002de
> nable_002ddemo
>
> I have a "one to many" script for that under:
>
> http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk/doc/examples/runemomniaggdemo.sh
>
> which is then post-processed via some stone knives and bearskins:
> http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk/doc/examples/post_proc.sh
> http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk/doc/examples/vrules.awk
> http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk/doc/examples/mins_maxes.awk
>
> I've also used that basic idea in some many to many tests involving 512
> concurrent netperf instances but that script isn't up on netperf.org.
>
> > TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS using 256, 1K, 4K and 16K message sizes
> > and 1 and 4 instances
>
> Netperf's own documentation and output is probably not good on this
> point (feel free to loose petards, though some instances may be cast in
> stone) but those aren't really message sizes. They are simply the
> quantity of data netperf is presenting to the transport in any one send
> call. They are send sizes.
>
> > Remote host to VM using 1, 4, 12 and 24 VMs (2 vCPUs) with the tests
> > running between an external host and each VM.
>
> I suppose it is implicit, and I'm just being pedantic/paranoid but you
> are confident of the limits of the external host?
Yes I am. It's pretty much an identical system to the KVM host and has
demonstrated much greater performance when running bare-metal scenarios.
Plenty of CPU left on all cores, etc.
>
> > Local VM to VM using 2, 4, 12 and 24 VMs (2 vCPUs) with the tests
> > running between VM pairs on the same host (no TCP_MAERTS done in
> > this situation).
> >
> > For TCP_RR and UDP_RR tests I report the transaction rate as the
> > score and the transaction rate / KVMhost CPU% as the efficiency.
> >
> > For TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS tests I report the throughput in Mbps
> > as the score and the throughput / KVMhost CPU% as the efficiency.
> >
> > The KVM host machine is a nehalem-based 2-socket, 4-cores/socket
> > system (E5530 @ 2.40GHz) with hyperthreading disabled and an Intel
> > 10GbE single port network adapter.
> >
> > There's a lot of data and I hope this is the clearest way to report
> > it. The remote host to VM results are first followed by the local
> > VM to VM results.
>
> Looks reasonable as far as presentation goes. Might have included a
> summary table of the various peaks:
>
> TCP_RR Remote Host to VM:
> Inst - Base - -Multi-Worker- - Per-CPU -
> VMs /VM Score Eff Score Eff Score Eff
> 1 60 117,448 3,929 148,330 3,616 137,996 3,898
> 4 60 308,838 3,555 170,486 1,738 285,073 2,988
> 12 60 156,868 1,574 152,205 1,527 223,701 2,250
> 24 60 144,684 1,457 146,788 1,468 240,963 2,513
>
That's a good suggestion.
I also have geometric mean comparisons to the baseline (with greater
than 100% indicating an improvement and less than 100% indicating
regression).
Remote:
-Multi-Worker- - Per-CPU -
VMs Score Eff Score Eff
1 105% 91% 109% 103%
1 (pinned) 102% 94% 103% 95%
4 84% 76% 95% 103%
12 91% 88% 113% 129%
24 95% 94% 135% 149%
Overall 95% 88% 110% 114%
Local:
-Multi-Worker- - Per-CPU -
VMs Score Eff Score Eff
1 98% 90% 86% 93%
1 (pinned) 94% 85% 82% 87%
4 94% 91% 86% 86%
12 85% 84% 103% 109%
24 93% 93% 141% 148%
Overall 93% 89% 97% 102%
Combined: 94% 88% 104% 108%
> Given the KVM host machine is 8 cores with hyperthreading disabled, I
> might have included a data point at 8 VMs even if they were 2 vCPU VMs,
> but that is just my gut talking. Certainly looking at the summary table
> I'm wondering where between 4 and 12 VMs the curve starts its downward
> trend. Does 12 and 24, 2vCPU VMs force moving around more than say 16
> or 32 would?
Yeah, it becomes a question of time. I run each test 3 times and
average the results, so to run the full suite takes a long time.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> happy benchmarking,
>
> rick jones
>
> > Remote Host to VM:
> > Host to 1 VM
> >
> > - Base - -Multi-Worker- - Per-CPU -
> >
> > Test Inst Score Eff Score Eff Score Eff
> > TCP_RR 1 9,587 984 9,725 1,145 9,252 1,041
> >
> > 10 63,919 3,095 51,841 2,415 55,226 2,884
> > 30 85,646 3,288 127,277 3,242 145,644 4,092
> > 60 117,448 3,929 148,330 3,616 137,996 3,898
> >
> > UDP_RR 1 10,815 1,174 10,125 1,255 7,913 1,150
> >
> > 10 53,989 3,082 59,590 2,875 52,353 3,328
> > 30 91,484 4,115 95,312 3,042 110,715 3,659
> > 60 107,466 4,689 173,443 4,351 158,141 4,235
> >
> > TCP_STREAM
> >
> > 256 1 2,724 140 2,450 131 2,681 150
> >
> > 4 5,027 137 4,147 146 3,998 117
> >
> > 1024 1 5,602 235 4,623 169 5,425 238
> >
> > 4 5,987 212 5,991 133 6,827 175
> >
> > 4096 1 6,202 256 6,753 211 7,247 279
> >
> > 4 4,996 192 5,771 159 7,124 202
> >
> > 16384 1 6,258 259 7,211 214 8,453 308
> >
> > 4 4,591 179 5,788 181 6,925 217
> >
> > TCP_MAERTS
> >
> > 256 1 1,951 85 1,871 89 1,899 97
> >
> > 4 4,757 129 4,102 140 4,279 116
> >
> > 1024 1 7,479 381 6,970 371 7,374 427
> >
> > 4 8,931 385 6,612 258 8,731 417
> >
> > 4096 1 9,276 464 9,296 456 9,131 510
> >
> > 4 9,381 452 9,032 367 9,338 446
> >
> > 16384 1 9,153 496 8,817 589 9,238 516
> >
> > 4 9,358 478 9,006 367 9,350 462
> >
> > Host to 1 VM (VM pinned to a socket)
> >
> > - Base - -Multi-Worker- - Per-CPU -
> >
> > Test Inst Score Eff Score Eff Score Eff
> > TCP_RR 1 9,992 1,019 9,899 917 8,963 899
> >
> > 10 60,731 3,236 60,015 2,444 55,860 3,059
> > 30 127,375 4,042 146,571 3,922 163,806 4,389
> > 60 173,021 4,972 149,549 4,662 161,397 4,330
> >
> > UDP_RR 1 10,854 1,253 7,983 1,120 7,647 1,206
> >
> > 10 68,128 3,804 64,335 4,067 53,343 3,233
> > 30 92,456 3,994 112,101 4,219 111,610 3,598
> > 60 135,741 4,590 184,441 4,422 184,527 4,546
> >
> > TCP_STREAM
> >
> > 256 1 2,564 146 2,530 147 2,497 150
> >
> > 4 4,757 139 4,300 127 4,245 124
> >
> > 1024 1 4,700 209 6,062 323 5,627 247
> >
> > 4 6,828 214 7,125 153 6,561 172
> >
> > 4096 1 6,676 281 7,672 286 7,760 290
> >
> > 4 6,258 236 6,410 171 7,354 225
> >
> > 16384 1 6,712 289 8,217 297 8,457 322
> >
> > 4 5,764 235 6,285 200 7,554 245
> >
> > TCP_MAERTS
> >
> > 256 1 1,673 82 1,444 71 1,756 88
> >
> > 4 6,385 175 5,671 155 5,685 153
> >
> > 1024 1 7,500 427 6,884 414 7,640 429
> >
> > 4 9,310 444 8,659 496 8,200 350
> >
> > 4096 1 8,427 477 9,201 515 8,825 422
> >
> > 4 9,372 478 9,184 394 9,391 446
> >
> > 16384 1 8,840 500 9,205 555 9,239 482
> >
> > 4 9,379 495 9,079 385 9,389 472
> >
> > Host to 4 VMs
> >
> > - Base - -Multi-Worker- - Per-CPU -
> >
> > Test Inst Score Eff Score Eff Score Eff
> > TCP_RR 1 38,635 949 34,063 843 35,432 897
> >
> > 10 193,703 2,604 157,699 1,841 180,323 2,858
> > 30 279,736 3,301 170,343 1,739 269,827 2,875
> > 60 308,838 3,555 170,486 1,738 285,073 2,988
> >
> > UDP_RR 1 42,209 1,136 36,035 904 36,974 975
> >
> > 10 177,286 2,616 166,999 2,043 178,470 2,466
> > 30 296,415 3,731 221,738 2,488 260,630 2,966
> > 60 353,784 4,179 209,489 2,152 306,792 3,440
> >
> > TCP_STREAM
> >
> > 256 1 8,409 113 7,517 101 7,178 115
> >
> > 4 8,963 93 7,825 80 8,606 91
> >
> > 1024 1 9,382 119 10,223 192 9,314 128
> >
> > 4 9,233 101 9,085 110 8,585 105
> >
> > 4096 1 9,391 124 9,393 125 9,300 140
> >
> > 4 9,303 103 9,151 102 8,601 106
> >
> > 16384 1 9,395 121 8,715 128 9,378 135
> >
> > 4 9,322 105 9,135 101 8,691 121
> >
> > TCP_MAERTS
> >
> > 256 1 8,629 125 7,045 112 7,559 109
> >
> > 4 9,389 145 7,091 80 9,335 156
> >
> > 1024 1 9,385 201 9,349 148 9,320 248
> >
> > 4 9,392 154 9,340 148 9,390 226
> >
> > 4096 1 9,387 239 9,339 151 9,379 291
> >
> > 4 9,392 167 9,389 124 9,390 259
> >
> > 16384 1 9,374 236 9,366 150 9,391 317
> >
> > 4 9,365 167 9,394 123 9,390 284
> >
> > Host to 12 VMs
> >
> > - Base - -Multi-Worker- - Per-CPU -
> >
> > Test Inst Score Eff Score Eff Score Eff
> > TCP_RR 1 79,628 928 85,717 944 72,760 885
> >
> > 10 106,348 1,067 94,032 944 164,548 2,017
> > 30 131,313 1,318 116,431 1,168 206,560 2,367
> > 60 156,868 1,574 152,205 1,527 223,701 2,250
> >
> > UDP_RR 1 90,762 1,059 93,904 1,037 75,512 919
> >
> > 10 149,381 1,499 113,254 1,136 194,153 1,951
> > 30 177,803 1,783 132,818 1,333 235,682 2,370
> > 60 201,833 2,025 154,871 1,554 258,133 2,595
> >
> > TCP_STREAM
> >
> > 256 1 8,549 86 7,173 72 8,407 85
> >
> > 4 8,910 89 8,693 87 8,768 88
> >
> > 1024 1 9,397 95 9,371 94 9,376 95
> >
> > 4 9,289 93 9,268 100 8,898 92
> >
> > 4096 1 9,399 95 9,415 95 9,401 97
> >
> > 4 9,336 94 9,319 94 8,938 94
> >
> > 16384 1 9,405 95 9,402 96 9,397 102
> >
> > 4 9,366 94 9,345 94 8,890 94
> >
> > TCP_MAERTS
> >
> > 256 1 4,646 49 2,273 23 9,232 135
> >
> > 4 9,393 107 8,019 81 9,414 134
> >
> > 1024 1 9,393 115 9,403 104 9,399 178
> >
> > 4 9,406 110 9,383 98 9,392 157
> >
> > 4096 1 9,393 114 9,409 104 9,388 202
> >
> > 4 9,388 110 9,387 98 9,382 181
> >
> > 16384 1 9,396 114 9,391 104 9,394 221
> >
> > 4 9,411 110 9,384 98 9,391 192
> >
> > Host to 24 VMs
> >
> > - Base - -Multi-Worker- - Per-CPU -
> >
> > Test Inst Score Eff Score Eff Score Eff
> > TCP_RR 1 110,139 1,118 101,765 1,033 79,189 805
> >
> > 10 94,757 948 90,872 915 156,821 1,581
> > 30 119,904 1,199 120,728 1,207 214,151 2,211
> > 60 144,684 1,457 146,788 1,468 240,963 2,513
> >
> > UDP_RR 1 129,655 1,316 120,071 1,201 91,208 914
> >
> > 10 119,204 1,201 104,645 1,046 208,432 2,340
> > 30 158,887 1,601 136,629 1,366 249,329 2,517
> > 60 179,365 1,794 159,883 1,610 259,018 2,651
> >
> > TCP_STREAM
> >
> > 256 1 5,899 59 4,258 44 8,071 82
> >
> > 4 8,739 89 8,195 83 7,934 82
> >
> > 1024 1 8,477 86 7,498 76 9,268 93
> >
> > 4 9,205 93 9,171 94 8,159 84
> >
> > 4096 1 9,334 96 8,992 92 9,324 97
> >
> > 4 9,255 95 9,221 92 8,237 85
> >
> > 16384 1 9,373 96 9,356 95 9,311 96
> >
> > 4 9,283 94 9,275 93 8,317 86
> >
> > TCP_MAERTS
> >
> > 256 1 739 7 770 8 9,186 129
> >
> > 4 7,804 79 7,573 76 9,253 122
> >
> > 1024 1 1,763 18 1,759 18 9,287 146
> >
> > 4 9,204 99 9,166 93 9,389 155
> >
> > 4096 1 3,430 35 3,403 35 9,348 161
> >
> > 4 9,372 100 9,315 95 9,385 151
> >
> > 16384 1 9,309 102 9,306 97 9,353 175
> >
> > 4 9,378 100 9,392 96 9,377 159
> >
> > Local VM to VM:
> > 1 VM to 1 VM
> >
> > - Base - -Multi-Worker- - Per-CPU -
> >
> > Test Inst Score Eff Score Eff Score Eff
> > TCP_RR 1 7,422 506 7,698 462 6,281 450
> >
> > 10 49,662 1,362 47,553 1,205 43,258 1,270
> > 30 91,657 1,538 99,319 1,471 89,478 1,499
> > 60 106,168 1,658 106,430 1,503 99,205 1,576
> >
> > UDP_RR 1 8,414 552 8,532 528 6,976 499
> >
> > 10 58,359 1,645 55,283 1,398 48,094 1,457
> > 30 91,046 1,736 109,403 1,721 92,109 1,715
> > 60 128,835 2,021 130,382 1,807 118,563 1,853
> >
> > TCP_STREAM
> >
> > 256 1 2,029 60 1,923 54 1,998 64
> >
> > 4 3,861 66 3,445 53 2,914 54
> >
> > 1024 1 7,374 205 6,465 174 5,704 165
> >
> > 4 8,474 196 7,541 161 6,274 156
> >
> > 4096 1 12,825 295 11,921 275 10,262 262
> >
> > 4 12,639 253 13,395 260 11,451 264
> >
> > 16384 1 14,576 331 14,141 291 11,925 305
> >
> > 4 16,016 327 14,210 274 13,656 308
> >
> > 1 VM to 1 VM (each VM pinned to a socket)
> >
> > - Base - -Multi-Worker- - Per-CPU -
> >
> > Test Inst Score Eff Score Eff Score Eff
> > TCP_RR 1 7,145 489 7,840 477 5,965 467
> >
> > 10 51,016 1,406 47,881 1,223 45,232 1,288
> > 30 92,785 1,580 103,453 1,512 91,437 1,523
> > 60 120,160 1,817 115,058 1,595 102,734 1,611
> >
> > UDP_RR 1 7,908 547 8,704 541 6,552 528
> >
> > 10 59,807 1,653 56,598 1,435 50,524 1,488
> > 30 90,302 1,738 113,861 1,765 94,640 1,720
> > 60 141,684 2,196 141,866 1,919 125,334 1,917
> >
> > TCP_STREAM
> >
> > 256 1 2,210 64 1,291 32 2,069 64
> >
> > 4 3,993 64 3,441 52 2,780 50
> >
> > 1024 1 8,106 217 7,571 198 5,709 165
> >
> > 4 8,471 206 8,756 174 6,531 157
> >
> > 4096 1 15,360 350 13,825 303 10,717 271
> >
> > 4 14,671 330 12,604 263 11,266 258
> >
> > 16384 1 18,284 395 16,305 337 13,185 317
> >
> > 4 15,451 331 12,438 247 14,699 316
> >
> > 2 VMs to 2 VMs (4 VMs total)
> >
> > - Base - -Multi-Worker- - Per-CPU -
> >
> > Test Inst Score Eff Score Eff Score Eff
> > TCP_RR 1 15,498 491 16,518 460 13,008 441
> >
> > 10 71,425 983 79,711 1,063 85,087 1,037
> > 30 102,132 1,436 82,191 1,145 100,504 1,076
> > 60 127,670 1,608 96,815 1,262 104,694 1,119
> >
> > UDP_RR 1 17,091 548 18,214 538 14,780 492
> >
> > 10 77,682 1,129 87,523 1,235 86,755 1,165
> > 30 131,830 1,826 92,844 1,327 111,839 1,232
> > 60 145,688 1,952 111,315 1,520 116,358 1,296
> >
> > TCP_STREAM
> >
> > 256 1 5,085 72 3,900 50 2,430 38
> >
> > 4 6,622 70 4,337 48 5,032 58
> >
> > 1024 1 15,262 206 15,022 195 7,000 115
> >
> > 4 14,205 174 15,288 174 11,030 148
> >
> > 4096 1 15,020 197 21,694 261 13,583 198
> >
> > 4 16,818 205 16,076 195 17,175 238
> >
> > 16384 1 19,671 261 23,699 290 22,396 306
> >
> > 4 18,648 229 17,901 218 17,122 251
> >
> > 6 VMs to 6 VMs (12 VMs total)
> >
> > - Base - -Multi-Worker- - Per-CPU -
> >
> > Test Inst Score Eff Score Eff Score Eff
> > TCP_RR 1 30,242 400 32,281 390 27,737 401
> >
> > 10 73,461 783 61,856 644 93,259 1,000
> > 30 98,638 1,034 81,799 844 107,022 1,121
> > 60 114,238 1,200 91,772 944 110,839 1,152
> >
> > UDP_RR 1 33,017 438 35,540 429 30,022 438
> >
> > 10 84,676 910 67,838 711 112,339 1,220
> > 30 110,799 1,156 90,555 932 128,928 1,357
> > 60 129,679 1,354 100,715 1,033 136,503 1,429
> >
> > TCP_STREAM
> >
> > 256 1 6,947 72 5,380 56 6,138 72
> >
> > 4 8,400 85 7,660 77 8,893 89
> >
> > 1024 1 13,698 146 10,307 108 13,023 158
> >
> > 4 15,391 157 13,242 135 17,264 182
> >
> > 4096 1 18,928 202 14,580 154 16,970 189
> >
> > 4 18,826 191 17,262 175 19,558 212
> >
> > 16384 1 22,176 234 17,716 187 21,245 243
> >
> > 4 21,306 215 20,332 206 18,353 227
> >
> > 12 VMs to 12 VMs (24 VMs total)
> >
> > - Base - -Multi-Worker- - Per-CPU -
> >
> > Test Inst Score Eff Score Eff Score Eff
> > TCP_RR 1 72,926 731 67,338 675 32,662 387
> >
> > 10 62,441 625 59,277 594 87,286 891
> > 30 72,761 728 67,760 679 102,549 1,041
> > 60 78,087 782 74,654 748 100,687 1,016
> >
> > UDP_RR 1 82,662 829 80,875 810 34,915 421
> >
> > 10 71,424 716 67,754 679 111,753 1,147
> > 30 79,495 796 75,512 756 134,576 1,372
> > 60 83,339 835 77,523 778 137,058 1,390
> >
> > TCP_STREAM
> >
> > 256 1 2,870 29 2,631 26 7,907 80
> >
> > 4 8,424 84 8,026 80 8,929 90
> >
> > 1024 1 3,674 37 3,121 31 15,644 164
> >
> > 4 14,256 143 13,342 134 16,116 168
> >
> > 4096 1 5,068 51 4,366 44 16,179 168
> >
> > 4 17,015 171 16,321 164 17,940 186
> >
> > 16384 1 9,768 98 9,025 90 19,233 203
> >
> > 4 18,981 190 18,202 183 18,964 203
> >
> > On Thursday, March 22, 2012 05:16:30 PM Shirley Ma wrote:
> >> Resubmit it with the right format.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shirley Ma<xma@...ibm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar<krkumar2@...ibm.com>
> >> Tested-by: Tom Lendacky<toml@...ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> drivers/vhost/net.c | 26 ++-
> >> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 300
> >>
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- drivers/vhost/vhost.h |
> >> 16 ++-
> >>
> >> 3 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Tom
Thomas Lendacky
Linux Technology Center - Performance
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists