[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F6D0B24.1010300@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:45:40 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Thomas Lendacky <tahm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] NUMA aware scheduling per cpu vhost thread
On 3/23/12 12:32 PM, Thomas Lendacky wrote:
> Quick description of the tests:
> TCP_RR and UDP_RR using 256 byte request/response size in 1, 10, 30
> and 60 instances
> TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS using 256, 1K, 4K and 16K message sizes
> and 1 and 4 instances
>
> Remote host to VM using 1, 4, 12 and 24 VMs (2 vCPUs) with the tests
> running between an external host and each VM.
>
> Local VM to VM using 2, 4, 12 and 24 VMs (2 vCPUs) with the tests
> running between VM pairs on the same host (no TCP_MAERTS done in
> this situation).
>
> For TCP_RR and UDP_RR tests I report the transaction rate as the
> score and the transaction rate / KVMhost CPU% as the efficiency.
>
> For TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS tests I report the throughput in Mbps
> as the score and the throughput / KVMhost CPU% as the efficiency.
Would you mind sharing the netperf commands you are running and an
example of the math done to arrive at the summaries presented?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists