netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3] [BUGFIX] memcg/tcp : fix to see use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F7427E4.2020307@parallels.com>
Date:	Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:14:12 +0200
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [BUGFIX] memcg/tcp : fix to see use_hierarchy in
 tcp memcontrol cgroup

On 03/29/2012 09:03 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> 
> Now, tcp memory control cgroup ignores memcg's use_hierarchy value
> and act as use_hierarchy=1 always. After this patch, tcp memcontrol will
> work as memcg is designed.
> 
> Note:
>     I know there is a discussion to remove use_hierarchy but this is BUG, now.
> 

Kame,

Are you sure about that?

I just tried it myself, and it seems to work:

root@...5072-11:~/glommer-temporary/a/b# cat memory.kmem.tcp.usage_in_bytes
724992
root@...5072-11:~/glommer-temporary/a/b# cat
../memory.kmem.tcp.usage_in_bytes
0


Did you got this conclusion through testing or code inspection?

As a matter of fact, that's why I believe the current behavior is indeed
correct:

the res_counter is initialized as:

        parent_cg = tcp_prot.proto_cgroup(parent);
        if (parent_cg)
                res_parent = parent_cg->memory_allocated;

        res_counter_init(&tcp->tcp_memory_allocated, res_parent);

now, parent is drawn from parent_mem_cgroup(), that reads as follows:

struct mem_cgroup *parent_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
        if (!memcg->res.parent)
                return NULL;
        return mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(memcg->res.parent, res);
}


so if we have use_hierarchy = 0, res.parent should be NULL (because that
is the way we initialize it)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html