[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1333133775.2325.2426.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:56:15 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jan Seiffert <kaffeemonster@...glemail.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Matt Evans <matt@...abs.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH V4 1/3] bpf jit: Make the
filter.c::__load_pointer helper non-static for the jits
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 17:08 +0200, Jan Seiffert wrote:
> The function is renamed to make it a little more clear what it does.
> It is not added to any .h because it is not for general consumption, only for
> bpf internal use (and so by the jits).
>
> Signed-of-by: Jan Seiffert <kaffeemonster@...glemail.com>
>
Missing "---" line separator (check Documentation/SubmittingPatches line
490)
You can check http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/149683/ and see there is
a problem, compared to http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/149441/ for
example
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -40,8 +40,12 @@
> #include <linux/reciprocal_div.h>
> #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
>
> -/* No hurry in this branch */
> -static void *__load_pointer(const struct sk_buff *skb, int k, unsigned int size)
> +/*
> + * No hurry in this branch
> + *
> + * Exported for the bpf jit load helper.
> + */
Seems good to me, maybe add a strong warning in the comment to say that
function prototype can NOT change without major surgery in ASM files,
since assembler wont catch the prototype change for us.
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists