netdev - Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 02/28] ethtool: Introduce a method for getting time stamping capabilities.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120402180422.GB20984@netboy.at.omicron.at>
Date:	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 20:04:23 +0200
From:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Martin Porter <mporter@...arflare.com>,
	Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 02/28] ethtool: Introduce a method for
 getting time stamping capabilities.

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 06:32:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 
> Given that this doesn't require specific support from the driver,
> shouldn't it be made to work without dev->ethtool_ops being set at all
> (as for ETHTOOL_GDRVINFO)?

I'll take a look at that.
 
> Also should it require CAP_NET_ADMIN?  I think it probably shouldn't, in
> which case you need to add it to the list of commands for which we don't
> check that.

Agreed. Tomorrow I'll repost.

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html