[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120402.005508.810320049567209896.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:55:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: richardcochran@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
mporter@...arflare.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 00/28] ethtool: support time stamping and
phc clocks
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 17:19:45 +0200
> Support for SO_TIMESTAMPING of network packets and PTP Hardware Clocks
> has been expanding over the last year or two. In an ideal world, every
> host would have exactly one PTP hardware clock, and every Ethernet MAC
> would support SO_TIMESTAMPING on both the transmit and receive paths.
> However, since we do not yet have full coverage for these features,
> user space programs need a way to discover what a given interface
> supports in these two areas.
...
> This series exposes the hardware and driver capabilities known to user
> space via ethtool.
>
> Since the PHC code was first merged, this has become the number one
> requested new feature.
>
> Patch number 3 applies on top of my recent two igb/phc patches.
> Patch number 12 applies on top of my recent e100 patch.
>
> The new feature has been tested on the following hardware:
>
> igb Hardware time stamping in the MAC
> dp83640 Hardware time stamping in the PHY
> r8169 Software Tx time stamping in the MAC
No real objections from me, Ben?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists