[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1333419304.18626.5.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 04:15:04 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: remi@...lab.net, levinsasha928@...il.com,
remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com, davej@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phonet: Check input from user before allocating
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 21:59 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 03:53:17 +0200
>
> > Not that AF_UNIX does nothing in this respect, it can use order-XX pages
> > for large datagrams.
> >
> > (I beleve I sent a patch some time ago to address this point)
>
> Yes, on the datagram side it's a problem.
>
> For stream AF_UNIX sockets the allocation is capped at SKB_MAX_ALLOC
> which evaluates to an order 2 page.
>
> Overall, AF_UNIX ought to be easy to deal with since all of the
> routines that copy data between userspace and SKBs can handle
> segmented SKBs and thus most of the work is converting over to
> sock_alloc_send_pskb() and setting data_len how we set the normal
> length of sock_alloc_skb_skb() currently.
>
> Anyways, feel free to resubmit your patch.
This was indeed a basic patch, but it probably can lower raw performance
on some apps, (if memory frag is not an issue) so I need to bench it.
Any idea of a representative benchmark in dgram af_unix ?
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/114103/
I'll respin it with proper performance resuts.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists