[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120403.162542.2077088434639546515.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:25:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: richardcochran@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
mporter@...arflare.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 net-next 00/28] ethtool: support time stamping and
phc clocks
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:47:24 +0200
> The new feature has been tested on the following hardware:
>
> igb Hardware time stamping in the MAC
I don't know how, it doesn't even build.
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c: In function ‘igb_ethtool_get_ts_info’:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c:2195:13: error: ‘struct igb_adapter’ has no member named ‘ptp_clock’
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c:2196:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ptp_clock_index’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c:2196:44: error: ‘struct igb_adapter’ has no member named ‘ptp_clock’
If these patches depend upon changes not in my tree, and you haven't
even mentioned this, I'm going to be _extremely_ irritated.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists