[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120403.172548.2299885807875686272.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:25:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: greearb@...delatech.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mmaruseac@...acom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net: fix /proc/net/dev regression
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 08:36:48 -0700
> On 04/03/2012 01:33 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Commit f04565ddf52 (dev: use name hash for dev_seq_ops) added a second
>> regression, as some devices are missing from /proc/net/dev if many
>> devices are defined.
>>
>> When seq_file buffer is filled, the last ->next/show() method is
>> canceled (pos value is reverted to value prior ->next() call)
>>
>> Problem is after above commit, we dont restart the lookup at right
>> position in ->start() method.
>>
>> Fix this by removing the internal 'pos' pointer added in commit, since
>> we need to use the 'loff_t *pos' provided by seq_file layer.
>>
>> This also reverts commit 5cac98dd0 (net: Fix corruption
>> in /proc/*/net/dev_mcast), since its not needed anymore.
>>
>> Reported-by: Ben Greear<greearb@...delatech.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet<eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> Cc: Mihai Maruseac<mmaruseac@...acom.com>
>
> This appears to fix the problem. I do find it mildly irritating
> that the ordering is now random in /proc/net/dev, but I guess
> that is the price of progress.
>
> Tested-by: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
>
> Thanks for the quick fix!
Applied, and queued up for -stable, thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists