[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 02:04:43 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] e100: enable transmit time stamping.
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 09:29 -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
> This patch enables software (and phy device) transmit time stamping.
> Tested on an old PIII laptop with built in NIC.
>
> Cc: Alex Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
> Cc: Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
> Cc: Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>
> Cc: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>
> Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
> Cc: John Ronciak <john.ronciak@...el.com>
> Cc: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Richard-
I had this patch in my queue, but during testing we found some serious
issues with some adapters. With every 82559 based adapter Aaron tried
the system would panic on driver load. This included at least one
sampling of D101S and D101M. Every other e100 chipset Aaron tried
(82557, 82558, 82550) appeared to work fine.
So I am dropping this patch as is due to the kernel panics.
Cheers,
Jeff
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists