lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 14:06:14 +0800
From:	hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To:	'Francois Romieu' <romieu@...zoreil.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] r8169: support RTL8411

Francois Romieu [mailto:romieu@...zoreil.com] 
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 3:25 PM
> To: Hayeswang
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] r8169: support RTL8411
> 
> Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com> :
> > Support the new chip RTL8411.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
> 
> I do not see any change related to rtl_init_jumbo_ops. If 
> NULL is ok for
> jumbo_{enable / disable}, it deserves to be outlined in the commit
> message.
> 
> No reviewer can figure what's going on otherwise.
> 

There is nothing to do for rtl_init_jumbo_ops. It is all right for keeping NULL.
Do I need to resend this patch?
 
Best Regards,
Hayes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ