[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120405134743.GB16870@darkmag.usersys.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:47:43 +0200
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: properly unset current_arp_slave on slave link
up
When a slave comes up, we're unsetting the current_arp_slave without
removing active flags from it, which can lead to situations where we have
more than one slave with active flags in active-backup mode.
To avoid this situation we must remove the active flags from a slave before
removing it as a current_arp_slave.
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 0c76186..ad731a1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3001,7 +3001,11 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_commit(struct bonding *bond, int delta_in_ticks)
trans_start + delta_in_ticks)) ||
bond->curr_active_slave != slave) {
slave->link = BOND_LINK_UP;
- bond->current_arp_slave = NULL;
+ if (bond->current_arp_slave) {
+ bond_set_slave_inactive_flags(
+ bond->current_arp_slave);
+ bond->current_arp_slave = NULL;
+ }
pr_info("%s: link status definitely up for interface %s.\n",
bond->dev->name, slave->dev->name);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists