[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120408234951.GA15993@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 07:49:51 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...erus.ca>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: orphan queued skbs if device tx can stall
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 08:13:25PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> commit 0110d6f22f392f976e84ab49da1b42f85b64a3c5
> tun: orphan an skb on tx
> Fixed a configuration where skbs get queued
> at the tun device forever, blocking senders.
>
> However this fix isn't waterproof:
> userspace can control whether the interface
> is stopped, and if it is, packets
> get queued in the qdisc, again potentially forever.
>
> Complete the fix by setting a private flag and orphaning
> at the qdisc level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
1) Doesn't this break local UDP push-back?
2) Isn't the stall a bug in the backend and isn't this just
papering over that?
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists