[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1333962809.3007.32.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:13:29 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...erus.ca>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: orphan queued skbs if device tx can stall
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 11:42 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 04:39:58PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:34:02AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
> > > Puzzled. This patch orphans skbs only if the destination device sets
> > > IFF_TX_CAN_STALL. Since the physical NIC doesn't stall forever it never
> > > sets this flag.
> > >
> > > So it seems that this patch should not affect the configuration
> > > you describe at all.
> > >
> > > Could you please clarify? What did I miss?
> >
> > Oops, you're right. Somehow I was thinking you were patching
> > virtio-net instead of tun.
> >
> > Cheers,
>
> Cool. Want to ack the patch then just to make it clear you are happy?
I am not happy with this patch.
Since its Easter, I dont have much time to comment right now, I'll do
that tomorrow.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists