netdev - [PATCH v3 0/2] get rid of populate for memcg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1334010994-23301-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
Date:	Mon,  9 Apr 2012 19:36:32 -0300
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] get rid of populate for memcg

[ v3: fix bug with failed initialization, seen by Tejun ]

Hi Tejun,

Let me know if the following is acceptable. Turns out the only
operation with a side effect we do after the last failure spot,
is a get on the parent memcg, and the setup of our very own refcnt.

Both of them can be dealt with a mem_cgroup_put in the beginning
of the failure path. So I felt no need for any code reordering.

People from the memcg side, please verify if this is indeed
okay.

I actually tested it with some test code to force memcg_kmem_init()
to fail, and it seems to go all right.

I'll be happy to address any other problems you spot.

Glauber Costa (2):
  cgroup: pass struct mem_cgroup instead of struct cgroup to socket
    memcg
  cgroup: get rid of populate for memcg

 include/net/sock.h           |   12 ++++++------
 include/net/tcp_memcontrol.h |    4 ++--
 mm/memcontrol.c              |   39 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 net/core/sock.c              |   10 +++++-----
 net/ipv4/tcp_memcontrol.c    |    6 ++----
 5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html