[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120409082919.GA3471@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 16:29:20 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@...erus.ca>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: orphan queued skbs if device tx can stall
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:39:54AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 03:33:54PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:28:49AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
> > > > 1) Doesn't this break local UDP push-back?
> > >
> > > What is meant by UDP pushback here? Two tap
> > > devices communicating by UDP packets locally?
> > > This was always broken, see below.
> >
> > I mean push-back from UDP transmission to the physical NIC.
> >
> > Your patch breaks that
>
> I think there's some misunderstanding. pushback is only disabled
> for destinations that set IFF_TX_CAN_STALL. I expect that
> no physical NICs set this flag - only tun and possibly
> other userspace-controlled devices in the future.
I'm talking about an app running in the guest transmitting UDP
to the physical NIC via virtio/vhost. This will break with your
patch.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists