[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120410184916.GE24092@kvack.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:49:16 -0400
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2] Re: [RFC] l2tp/ipv6: support for L2TPv2 over UDP over IPv6
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:47:39AM +0100, James Chapman wrote:
> We've tested this in several L2TP environments - looks good. Will you be
> submitting a version soon?
Yes. I'll try to get that out tonight now that net-next is open again.
Also, I found a bug in OpenL2TPd (1.8 I think): certain types of AVPs are
not accepted if they are hidden, despite the fact that RFC 2661 permits
hiding these AVPs. The AVPs in question are: Assigned Tunnel ID, Challege,
Challenge Response and Assigned Session ID.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists